|
Julie Garland McLellan, one of Australia's leading governance consultants, advises Boards and Directors on complex and challenging issues which can be resolved in a variety of ways.
Julie publishes a regular newsletter, The Director's Dilemma, which features real life case studies designed to give directors exposure to issues and dilemmas that have taxed their peers. Three expert practitioners, including Succurro, are asked provide insights into solutions to each dilemma. The best of these case studies have subsequently been compiled into a book Dilemmas, Dilemmas: Practical Case Studies for Company Directors (Volume 1).
Here are a selection of the contributions that Succurro has made.
|
|
Saskia chairs the audit committee of a government owned company. The board complies with commonly accepted good governance practices and is well supported by a qualified and skilful secretariat. The board are accustomed to getting good marks in their annual performance review and, in five years service, Saskia has not seen any substantive issues raised in reviews. She suspects that a favourable outcome has been a selection criterion for the review consultancy.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Susanne is a director of a small family company that has operated reasonably successfully for about eight years. Demand for the company’s product is strong and growing. Recently cash flow has been tight and the company has delayed payments to creditors and not submitted a couple of BAS statements so as to use the net GST that would otherwise be paid out.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Timothy (Tim) is a director of his family business. His fellow directors are his brother and his brother’s wife. He and his brother won 40% of the shares each and the remaining 20% are held in a trust for the grandchildren of the founder, Tim’s deceased father. Tim is the managing director and his brother is non executive chairman. All board members are over sixty years old.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Suellen is a director on a not-for-profit board. One of her colleagues is a long standing board member and widely respected across the organisation for his contribution. Suellen is worried, however, because he often proposes contractors or suppliers to undertake work for the company.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Jane is an independent non-executive director of a listed industrial chemicals company which was originally family owned and is still managed by family members. The CEO of the company has purchased luxury assets such as a yacht, a jet aircraft etc. ostensibly for entertaining company guests, customers and opinion makers and as a staff welfare measure for use of the staff.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Lydia is an executive for a multinational company; she is also director of a joint venture (JV) company owned by her employer (30%) and two other shareholders (each with 35%). The board is comprised of Lydia and a representative of each of the other shareholders. Lydia is chairman. The others defer to her because she has governance training and works for a large corporation; they are both from small businesses.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |